Другие статьи

Цель нашей работы - изучение аминокислотного и минерального состава травы чертополоха поникшего
2010

Слово «этика» произошло от греческого «ethos», что в переводе означает обычай, нрав. Нравы и обычаи наших предков и составляли их нравственность, общепринятые нормы поведения.
2010

Артериальная гипертензия (АГ) является важнейшей медико-социальной проблемой. У 30% взрослого населения развитых стран мира определяется повышенный уровень артериального давления (АД) и у 12-15 % - наблюдается стойкая артериальная гипертензия
2010

Целью нашего исследования явилось определение эффективности применения препарата «Гинолакт» для лечения ВД у беременных.
2010

Целью нашего исследования явилось изучение эффективности и безопасности препарата лазолван 30мг у амбулаторных больных с ХОБЛ.
2010

Деформирующий остеоартроз (ДОА) в настоящее время является наиболее распространенным дегенеративно-дистрофическим заболеванием суставов, которым страдают не менее 20% населения земного шара.
2010

Целью работы явилась оценка анальгетической эффективности препарата Кетанов (кеторолак трометамин), у хирургических больных в послеоперационном периоде и возможности уменьшения использования наркотических анальгетиков.
2010

Для более объективного подтверждения мембранно-стабилизирующего влияния карбамезапина и ламиктала нами оценивались перекисная и механическая стойкости эритроцитов у больных эпилепсией
2010

Нами было проведено клинико-нейропсихологическое обследование 250 больных с ХИСФ (работающих в фосфорном производстве Каратау-Жамбылской биогеохимической провинции)
2010


C использованием разработанных алгоритмов и моделей был произведен анализ ситуации в системе здравоохранения биогеохимической провинции. Рассчитаны интегрированные показатели здоровья
2010

Специфические особенности Каратау-Жамбылской биогеохимической провинции связаны с производством фосфорных минеральных удобрений.
2010

The impact of the country’s financial development institutions on the effectiveness of innovative activity

Purpose – to assess the impact of the activity of the regional technologies commercialization offices as the main component in the mechanism of interaction of participants in the innovative process at the regional level, on the effectiveness of innovative activity in the regions of the Republic of Kazakhstan.

Methodology – synthesis, content-analyze, accommodation, correlation-regression analysis of data, index method.

Originality/value – transition of the Republic of Kazakhstan economy to an innovative way of development is possible only on the basis of the accelerated technological development of economy real sector. At the same time, it is important to assess the impact of the country’s financial development institutions on the effectiveness of innovative activity of the regions in order to ensure their innovative development, formation of selective scientific-technical and innovative component, oriented to realization of reasonably chosen priorities.

Findings – on the basis of index method and correlation-regression analysis of the data, the impact of technologies commercialization offices as the main component in the mechanism of interaction of participants in the innovative process at the regional level, on the development of innovative activity in the regions of the republic was confirmed. The place and a role of state regulation of innovative activity in social and economic policy of the country are defined. Organizational and methodological problems during the developing and realization of innovative policy in the Republic of Kazakhstan are also in details investigated that causes need of development and promotion of development institutions in the country to achieve effective regional policy of innovations. 

Development of competitive advantages of the economy of Kazakhstan in the long term can only be ensured by transition of the economy of innovation. Scientific and technological progress is the basis for economic growth. The largest share of GDP in developed countries is new or improved technologies, products, services [1]. So, according to different assessments, the use of innovative technologies ensures 75%-100% of the increase in production in the industrial sphere [2]. In this connection, in the world economic competition, the states that have been able to create a favorable climate for the realization of innovative activity, including state support for applied and fundamental scientific research, formation of innovative infrastructure, training of specialists and scientific personnel for the purpose of realization of innovative activity, protection of intellectual property and involvement of innovations in economy [3].

So, innovative activity is the core of "Europe 2020" Strategy, because innovative activity according to this Strategy is the best way to successful solution of main social problems, such as aging and health problems, energy and resource deficit, climate change, becoming daily more and more relevant [4]. Scientific research and innovation directly contribute to the European level of prosperity and well-being of the individual and society as a whole. The main purpose of the R&D policy is the transformation of the European Union into a leading economy based on knowledge [5]. In this regard, it is useful for the Republic of Kazakhstan to understand the European trend in the development of innovative activity, primarily in the post-Soviet countries that are members of the EU (for example, in the Republic of Latvia), as well as the ways to develop cooperation with them in the innovative sphere.

The most important prerequisite for increasing economic competitiveness in the region of the country is innovative development in priority economic sectors that provide output with high added value [6]. For the development of high-tech industries, realization of innovative activity and scientific and technological developments in the Republic of Kazakhstan, laws and programs in this direction have been adopted, as well as the most important institutions for development in this field have been created [7].

One of the key directions of state policy in the sphere of innovative development is the development and promotion of development institutions in the country [8]. The most important institutions in this sphere are the following: Development Bank of Kazakhstan (further DBK); "DAMU" Entrepreneurship Development Fund (further DAMU); Investment Fund of Kazakhstan (further IFK); Science Fund; "National Innovation Fund" JSC (further "NIF" JSC), since 2012 – "National Agency for Technological Development" JSC (further "NATD" JSC). The main task of these development institutions is the financing of perspective projects that promote the development of new industries, the growth of the country’s economy, which have social significance.

The analysis of own and world experience has demonstrated that to carry out these tasks the single operator is needed, integrating component that should implement complex approach to develop innovative activity in the country [9]. "NATD" JSC became this operator with close cooperation with the regional technologies commercialization offices (hereinafter "TCO"), formed in 2011, which promote the establishment and development of partnership between inventors, local authorities and enterprises [10]. Now "NATD" JSC is the national institute of development in the sphere of technological development, which was created to assist in coordinating the processes of innovative activity and providing state support measures, using various financial instruments [11].

"NATD" JSC was created 21 regional Technology Commercialization Offices (TCO) in the country, in particular, in following regions of the country: Astana c.; Almaty c.; Pavlodar c. (Pavlodar region), UstKamenogorsk c., Semey c. (East-Kazakhstan region); Kyzylorda c. (Kyzylorda region); Karaganda c. (Karaganda region); Uralsk c. (West-Kazakhstan region); Shymkent c. (South-Kazakhstan region). The main purpose of Technology Commercialization Offices is to promote the commercialization of the results of scientific research carried out by research institutes and universities. Accordingly, the activity of TCO as the main component in the mechanism of interaction of participants in the innovative process at the regional level has a significant impact on the development of innovative activity in the region of the republic. To confirm this impact, we consider the indicators characterizing the effectiveness of innovative activity in the regions, and, ultimately, the wealth of the region, expressed as GRP per capita of the region.

The effectiveness of innovative activity in the regions can be assessed through the following indicators: the share of organizations that carry out R&D; the degree of innovative activity of the regions, expressed in percentage; expenses on R&D in relation to the gross regional product (GRP); the volume of production of innovative products in relation to expenses of their production; volume of production of innovative products in relation to GRP; the share of innovative-active enterprises in the region [12]. The use of relative indicators will allow avoiding the influence of regional scale on the choice of the region. In this case, only the qualitative aspect in the innovative development of the region will be compared. In order to determine the most active region in the innovation field, according to the above mentioned indicators, we will construct the index of innovative development of the region according to the formulas (1), (2):

The greatest value of the index characterizes the degree of its development. At the same time, the value obtained within the framework of more than 0.3 will correspond to a high degree of development of the region in the innovative attitude, 0.2-0.3 – medium development level, less than 0.2 – low. Calculations in accordance with the statistical data of the Republic of Kazakhstan Committee on Statistics for the regions of the country in 2015 are given in tables 1-6. 

Table 1 – The index of the number of innovative-active enterprises in the region in 2015 

 

 

Regions of Kazakhstan

 

 

Indicator, units

 

 

Index

Astana c.

541

1,000

Almaty c.

377

0,6759

Akmola region

90

0,1087

Aktobe region

86

0,1008

Almaty region

114

0,1561

Atyrau region

102

0,1324

West-Kazakhstan region

35

0

Zhambyl region

90

0,1087

Karaganda region

216

0,3577

Kostanay region

218

0,3617

Kyzylorda region

99

0,1265

Mangistau region

41

0,0118

South-Kazakhstan region

160

0,2470

Pavlodar region

65

0,0593

North-Kazakhstan region

111

0,1502

East-Kazakhstan region

240

0,4051

Хmax = 541

Хmin = 35

 

Table 2 – The index of expenses on R&D in relation to the gross regional product (GRP) in 2015 

Regions of Kazakhstan

Indicator

Index

Astana c.

2,7969

0,8406

Almaty c.

3,4935

0,9271

Akmola region

0,9929

0,2264

Aktobe region

0,3966

0,0593

Almaty region

0,5054

0,0898

Atyrau region

0,5729

0,1087

West-Kazakhstan region

0,4405

0,0716

Zhambyl region

0,6798

0,1387

Karaganda region

1,1579

0,2726

Kostanay region

0,4347

0,0700

 

Kyzylorda region

0,2022

0,0049

Mangistau region

3,7538

1,0000

South-Kazakhstan region

0,5312

0,0970

Pavlodar region

0,1848

0

North-Kazakhstan region

0,2680

0,1206

East-Kazakhstan region

1,4277

0,3482

Хmax = 3,7538

Хmin = 0,1848

Table 3 – The index of innovative activity of regions in 2015, in percentage 

Regions of Kazakhstan

Indicator, percentages

Index

Astana c.

13,2

0,9523

Almaty c.

4,7

0,6667

Akmola region

6,8

0,2667

Aktobe region

7,0

0,2857

Almaty region

6,9

0,2762

Atyrau region

8,0

0,3809

West-Kazakhstan region

4,1

0,0095

Zhambyl region

10,6

0,6286

Karaganda region

9,2

0,4952

Kostanay region

14,5

1,0000

Kyzylorda region

11,7

0,7333

Mangistau region

4,0

0

South-Kazakhstan region

6,9

0,2762

Pavlodar region

4,8

0,0761

North-Kazakhstan region

10,6

0,6285

East-Kazakhstan region

11,5

0,7142

Хmax = 14,5

Хmin = 4,0

 

Table 4 – The index of the number of organizations that carried out R&D in 2015 

Regions of Kazakhstan

Indicator, units

Index

Astana c.

53

0,3311

Almaty c.

152

1,0000

Akmola region

11

0,0473

Aktobe region

14

0,0675

Almaty region

11

0,0473

Atyrau region

10

0,0405

West-Kazakhstan region

7

0,0202

Zhambyl region

11

0,0473

Karaganda region

32

0,1892

Kostanay region

14

0,0675

Kyzylorda region

8

0,0270

Mangistau region

5

0,0067

South-Kazakhstan region

19

0,1013

Pavlodar region

9

0,0338

North-Kazakhstan region

4

0

East-Kazakhstan region

30

0,1757

Хmax = 152

Хmin = 4

Table 5 – The index of the volume of production of innovative products in relation to expenses of their production in 2015 

Regions of Kazakhstan

Indicator

Index

Astana c.

7,8541

0,1314

Almaty c.

0,7929

0,0107

Akmola region

11,5353

0,1943

Aktobe region

2,6579

0,0426

Almaty region

12,4483

0,2099

Atyrau region

3,1807

0,0515

West-Kazakhstan region

0,8575

0,0119

Zhambyl region

41,1856

0,7009

Karaganda region

5,2069

0,0862

Kostanay region

58,6864

1,0000

Kyzylorda region

29,2233

0,4965

Mangistau region

0,1634

0

South-Kazakhstan region

42,5165

0,7237

Pavlodar region

12,1848

0,2054

North-Kazakhstan region

50,9549

0,8679

East-Kazakhstan region

3,2221

0,0523

Хmax = 58,6864

Хmin = 0,1634

Table 6 – The index of the volume of production of innovative products in relation to GRP in 2015 

Regions of Kazakhstan

Indicator

Index

Astana c.

21,9671

0,7816

Almaty c.

2,7699

0,0866

Akmola region

11,4540

0,4010

Aktobe region

1,0540

0,0245

Almaty region

6,2919

0,2141

Atyrau region

1,8223

0,0523

West-Kazakhstan region

0,3778

0

Zhambyl region

27,9997

1,0000

Karaganda region

6,0293

0,2046

Kostanay region

25,5132

0,9099

Kyzylorda region

5,9084

0,2002

Mangistau region

0,6134

0,0085

South-Kazakhstan region

22,5856

0,8040

Pavlodar region

2,2521

0,0678

North-Kazakhstan region

13,6578

0,4808

East-Kazakhstan region

4,6003

0,1529

Хmax = 27,9997

Хmin = 0,3778

 

The obtained values of the index of innovative development of the region for 2015 are presented in table 7.

Table 7 – The index of innovative development of regions in the Republic of Kazakhstan for 2015 

Regions of Kazakhstan

Index

Degree of innovative development

Astana c.

0,78

high

Kostanay region

0,62

Almaty c.

0,50

South-Kazakhstan region

0,40

Karaganda region

0,40

Pavlodar region

0,38

East-Kazakhstan region

0,34

Kyzylorda region

0,28

medium

Akmola region

0,22

Almaty region

0,18

Atyrau region

0,24

West-Kazakhstan region

0,24

North-Kazakhstan region

0,12

low

Aktobe region

0,10

Zhambyl region

0,10

Mangistau region

0,07

Note – completed by author based on source [13]

In accordance with the obtained values, according to used method of calculation of the index of innovative development of the region, the largest value of the index have the regions in which Technology Commercialization Offices are operated promoting to commercialization of local c developments at the regional level, what confirms their effectiveness for the purpose of regional development, and in general the effectiveness in the future of the mechanism of interaction of participants in the innovative process at the regional level.

In addition, in order to determine the most active region in innovation field, the equation of the dependence of the gross regional product as the final result of the region’s activity is applicable, from the system of indicators that characterize innovative regional development on the basis of performing correlation-regression analysis.

This model will be the basis for analyzing the innovative development of regions and their further ranking depending on received GRP. To the system of indicators characterizing innovative regional development, we can include, in our opinion, the following indicators: total volume of innovative products at the enterprises of the region; the volume of improved and newly introduced products at the enterprises of the region; number of innovative active enterprises in the region; indicator of employed population in the innovative sphere; investment in fixed capital per capita in the region. Using the method of sequential inclusion, it is the most suitable five-factor model, which is presented in the following form, the formula (3): 

Y = 196837 + 121,2X1 + 12,18Х2 + 34871,5Х3 + 239,8Х4 + 196,4Х5 (3), where,

Y – gross regional product (GRP), billion tenge;;

Х1 – volume of improved products at the enterprises of the region, mln. tenge;

Х2 – total volume of innovative products at the enterprises of the region, mln. tenge; Х3 – quantity of innovative-active enterprises in the region;

Х4 – number of employees engaged in R&D, people;

Х5 – investment in fixed capital per capita in the region, mln. tenge/people.

It should be noted that a high level of the correlation coefficient with its approach to 1 will indicate a

close relationship between the influencing factors and GRP (R = 0.89). To calculate the degree of innovative development of the region in the integral form, we used the method of rating analysis based on the calculation of standardized coefficients. At the first stage of calculations, the base level is assigned to the region with the best indicator, which has the highest value with involvement of the maximum value – 1, in respect of which the calculations are made. The values of the remaining regions are calculated in fractions of one. This approach makes it possible to balance the values of the studied indicators and bring them into a single comparable type. The next step is squaring of the obtained values. Due to the fact that in the regression equation the significance of the indicators is not the same, the next step is to calculate the weight of each indicator depending on the degree of its impact on the gross regional product, and then use of the obtained values of the coefficients (multiplying them by the standardized corresponding coefficients) for investigation of weighted average values of innovative development of the regions of the republic.

In accordance with the calculation of the received indicators according to the statistical data of the Republic of Kazakhstan Committee on Statistics in 2015, the ranking of regions was carried out depending on the level of innovative development, by GRP indicator, presented in table 8. At the same time, the value obtained within the framework of more than 10 will correspond to a high degree of development in the innovative attitude of the region, from 6 to 10 – the average degree of development, below 6 – low. 

Table 8 – The degree of innovative development of regions, expressed through GRP 

Regions of Kazakhstan

Number of indicator

Degree of innovative development

Almaty c.

58,7

высокая

Astana c.

38,6

Karaganda region

31,2

East-Kazakhstan region

19,7

South-Kazakhstan region

11,6

Kyzylorda region

9,7

средняя

Pavlodar region

8,4

Kostanay region

9,3

Aktobe region

7,9

Akmola region

7,7

Almaty region

7,1

Atyrau region

6,5

West-Kazakhstan region

6,3

Mangistau region

5,2

низкая

North-Kazakhstan region

4,4

Zhambyl region

3,1

Note – completed by author based on source [13]

According to the ranking of regions, depending on the level of innovative development, expressed through GRP, the highest levels of innovative development have regions such as Almaty c., Astana c., Karaganda and East Kazakhstan regions. Slightly lower values in Kyzylorda and Pavlodar regions, which generally emphasizes the effectiveness of innovative activity in these regions, an important role in which is played the effectiveness of the functioning of Technologies Commercialization Offices in these regions.

Thus, it is proved that the effectiveness of realization of the activity of the financial development institutions fund (at the example of the activity of Technologies Commercialization Offices as the main component in the mechanism of interaction of participant in the innovative process at the regional level), really affects the effectiveness of innovative activity of the regions of the Republic of Kazakhstan. This confirms the need to maintain Technologies Commercialization Offices at the regional level that will promote the innovative product in the real sector of the economy, and, thereby, will provide an opportunity to use the intellectual potential of the regions with full return.

In addition, the functioning of regional technologies commercialization offices at regional level can become the basis for effective economic policy of the state in the sphere of innovative activity’s regulation, the key point of its activity is assistance in commercialization of scientific developments of domestic scientists and activation of innovative activity of scientists and enterprises in the regions of the country on this basis [14].

In this regard, a greater role will belong to the future development of scientific and technological institutions, to the growth of the effectiveness of the activity of research organizations, technology parks, technology commercialization offices, "NATD" JSC, thanks to which the technological component will be provided for the competitiveness of the economy of country regions.

 

References 

  1. Kupeshova S. , Unerbayeva R. U. Developing of Innovation Activity in Kazakhstan as the Main Way of Increasing Economic Competitiveness // International Conference «Modern Science: Problems and Perspectives». – Las Vegas-NV, USA: International Center for Education & Technology. – 2013. – № 4. – P. 465-467.
  2. Fageberg J., Srholec M. National innovation systems, capabilities and economic development // Research – 2008. – № 37. – P. 1417-1435.
  3. Bekniyazova D. Role of state innovative policy in development of old industrial territories and methods of its assessment // Materials of the all-Russian scientific and practical conference «Modernization of old industrial territories: success factors in the global economy». – Ekaterinburg: Ural Institute of Management. The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration. – 2014. – P. 7-10.
  4. Europe 2020: Europe’s growth strategy. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2013. – URL: http://ec.europa.eu/europe2020/pdf/europe_2020_explained.pdf (accessed: 29.04.2017)
  5. EUROPE 2020: A European strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth, European Commission, Brussels, 2010. – URL: http://ec.europa.eu/eu2020/pdf/COMPLET%20EN%20BARROSO%20%20 %20007%20-%20Europe%202020%20-%20EN%20version.pdf (accessed: 12.03.2017).
  6. Freeman , Soete L. The Economics of Industrial Innovation. – Cambridge: MIT Press, 1997. – 480 p.
  7. Bekniyazova S. Economical and Statistical Analysis of Innovative Development in the Republic of Kazakhstan // «The transformational process of law, the regional economy and economic policy: the relevant economic and political and legal issues» V International scientific and practical conference proceedings. – Riga: Baltic International Academy. – 2017. – P. 93-99.
  8. Национальный доклад по науке. – Астана-Алматы: РОО «Национальная Академия Наук Республики Казахстан», 2016. – 232 с.
  9. Lundwall -A., Gregersen B., Johnson B., Lorenz E. Innovation systems and economic development // 9na Conferencia Internacional Clobelics. – Buenos Aires: General Sarmiento. – 2011. – P. 26-28.
  10. Bekniyazova D. Estimation of Innovative Potential of Modern Enterprise in the Republic of Kazakhstan // Materials of the XIII international scientific and practical conference «Russia and Europe: the connection of culture and economy». – Prague: Publ. office «World Press s.r.o.». – 2015. – P. 444-446.
  11. Официальный Интернет-ресурс АО «Национальное агентство по технологическому развитию».
  12. URL: http://natd.gov.kz (дата обращения: 02.2017)
  13. Porter et. High Tech Indicators: Technology-based Competitiveness of 33 Nations. 2007 Report. – Atlanta: Georgia Institute of Technology, 2008. – 38 p.
  14. Официальный интернет-ресурс Комитета по статистике Министерства национальной экономики Республики Казахстан. – URL: http://www.stat.gov.kz (дата обращения: 03.2017)
  15. Бекниязова Д. С. Анализ развития экономического потенциала региона на основе инноваций (на примере Павлодарской области Республики Казахстан) // Вестник Кыргызского Экономического Университета имени М. Р. Рыскулбекова. – 2016. – №4 (38). – С. 80-83.

Разделы знаний

International relations

International relations

Law

Philology

Philology is the study of language in oral and written historical sources; it is the intersection between textual criticism, literary criticism, history, and linguistics.[

Technical science

Technical science