A comparative study on psychrophilic and mesophilic biooxidation of ferrous iron by pure cultures of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans and Acidithiobacillus ferrivorans

Biological oxidation of ferrous sulfate by Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans and Acidithiobacillus ferrivoransis an important process in the bioleaching of minerals and the treatment of acid mine drainage. The rate at which biooxidation reactions take place is directly related to the microorganisms'growth temperature. Decreasing the temperature of reaction causes both a decrease on the chemical reactions rates and a decrease on bacterial growth. In this study, the effects of pH and temperatures on oxidation of ferrous sulfate by a native At. ferrooxidans and At. ferrivorans strains were investigated. The biooxidation tests conducted in shake flasks at 28 °C and 8 °C and at initial pH 1.6 for 5 days. During the experiment, the mesophilic iron oxidizers were capable of growing on ferrous iron at concentrations of 4.5 g/L at low and optimum temperature. However, the rate of mesophilic biooxidation of ferrous iron was higher than that observed in the psychrophilic biooxidation. In conclusion, during the experiment the Atferrivorans strain 535 showed high activity in oxidizing at low temperature than other strains. It means even at very low temperatures, microorganisms play an important role in the oxidation and leaching of sulphide ores.

Introduction

Bioleaching is extraction of valuable metals from their ores using microorganisms. It as environmentally friendly technology offers an alternative to traditional pyrometallurgical methods [1]. There are two mechanisms for bioleaching of sulphideminerals: the direct and the indirect. In the direct mechanism, microorganisms situated at the mineral surface and dissolve metal ions. In the indirect mechanism, metal sulfides are chemically attacked by ferric iron, which is oxidized to sulfuric acid [2, 3]. Biooxidation of ferrous iron wereproven to be anessential step in bioleaching [4, 5]. Due to their importance in the bioleaching of sulfide minerals, the oxidative activity of chemolithotrophic microorganisms such as archaea and bacteria in a mesophilic and cold environments as well as moderately high and extremely high temperatures has been widely studied. Microorganisms have been frequently isolated from sulphide minerals in dumps, heaps and from flotation tailings are Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidansAcidithiobacillus thiooxidansAcidithiobacillus ferrivorans, etc. [6–9]. Flotation tailings are one of the largest mining wastes from sulphide minerals concentrated by pyrometallurgical process generated during the flotation process. In Kazakhstan over 22 billion tons of waste, of which more than 16 billion tons of mining and processing waste, about 6 billion tons of hazardous waste has been accumulated [10–14]. Thus, in order to reduce the health risk arising from the heavy metals such as arsenic, lead, and chromium it is necessary to develop strategies that could reduce toxicity. In this aspect, biogeotechnology, which is based on the natural ability of chemolithotrophic bacteria (At. ferrivorans, At.ferrooxidans, At.thiooxidans, etc.) is of great help to utilize either ex-situ or in-situ bioremediation of heavy metal polluted sites.The kinetics of mesophilic biooxidation of ferrous iron has been studied in our previous work [9].

To date, many studies on the biooxidation of ferrous iron using At. ferrooxidans are reported [13–15]. However, few experiments on biooxidation of iron by At. ferrivorans was conducted and several documents about biooxidation of ferrous iron byAt. ferrooxidans at low temperatures were reported [4, 16–18]. The aim of this work is to assess the At. ferrivorans strains biooxidation of ferrous iron and to compare the rate of this reaction with At. ferrooxidansstrains biooxidation of ferrous iron at different temperatures.

Materials and Methods

Microorganism and medium

The mesophilic iron oxidizerused in this study were 535 strain of At. ferrivoransand strains FT-2, FT-3 and 377 of At. ferrooxidanswhich was been previously isolated from gold deposits by our laboratory. The microorganisms were grown on a modified medium 9K-Fe containing (in grams per liter): KH2PO4 (3.0), MgSO4·7H2O (0.5), (NH4)2SO4 (3.0), KCl (0.1), Ca(NO3)2 (0.01). The mediualso supplemented with filter-sterilized FeSO4·7H2O (22.1). The cultures of At. ferrivorans and At. ferrooxidans were incubated in 750 mL Erlenmeyer flasks each containing 200 mL of the medium and 10 % (v/v) inoculumon a shakerincubator at 200 rpm at a temperature of 28 °C. The initial pH of the cultures was adjusted to 1.6 at room temperature using 10N H2SO4.

Biooxidation experiments at lotemperature

In order to study on ferrous iron biooxidationof different strains at low and optimal temperatures the experiments were realized in 250 mL sterile shake flasks containing 90 mL of the modified medium 9K-Fe (concentrations of ferrous iron was 4.5 kg·m-3) and 10 % (v/v) inoculum. The flasks were incubated on a rotary shaker at 160 rpm and temperatures of 8 ºC and 28 ºC. Samples were taken every day and analyzed for ferrous, total iron concentrations anpH. All the experiments were carried out under sterile conditions.

Analytical analysis

The pH of the test solutions was determined using a professional multichannel pH meter Mettler Toledo SevenMulti-A. The concentration of total iron and Fe2+ ions in the liquid phase was determined spectrophotometrically using a spectrometer (BioMate 3S UV-Visible, Thermo Scientifiс, USA)

Results and Discussion

Results of mesophilic biooxidation of ferrous iron at initial concentration of 4.5 g/L are presented in Figure 1. The biooxidation rate of ferrous iron (Fe2+) to ferric iron (Fe3+) was remarkably increasing in the flasks with microorganisms for 3 days, meantime in un-inoculated flask oxidation of Fe2+ was not happen: due to slow chemical oxidation. Despite added ferrous iron concentration was 4.5 g/L, at the end of the experiment the oxidized ferrous iron concentration was 4.8 g/L. The reason for increasing of the total iron is the added inoculum culture with 9 g/L of iron. The strains 377 and 535 showed thhighest activity. Variations of pH over time during the biooxidation process with different bacterial strains at 28 ºC are shown in Figure 2. The pH of the flasks inoculated with At. ferrooxidans FT-2 decreased significantly within the first 3 days of the experiment from pH 1.64 to 1.58. The pH propagation of 535 and FT-3cultures was quite similar. In the flasks with 377, pH was increased from 1.6 to 1.63. Meanwhile the pH did not drop greatly in the control flasks, which were conductewithout bacterial inoculation.

 

In Figure 3 the observed oxidation of Fe2+ to Fe3+ clearly demonstrates the presence in four type of strains growing at 8 ºC and able to oxidize Fe2+ iron at initially pH 1.6. In the flasks with microorganisms, the ferrous iron initially added warapidly oxidized to Fe3+ after only 5 days. ThA. ferrooxidans FT-2 strain showed the highest activity which was demonstrated by an increase of Fe3+ in solution. A small amount of Fe2+ (approximately 1.0 mg/L) was maintained in the media with the strain of A. ferrooxidans FT-3 till the end of the experiment. In the sterile flasks, some chemical oxidation was also obtained after 5 days. Figure 4 illustrates the results of the biooxidation of ferrous iron at initial pH 1.6. The trend of pH variations during biooxidation of Fe2+ to Fe3+ showethat the pH of the flasks with microorganismswas not decreased within the first 5 days of the experiment.

According to this study, these isolated strains of At. ferrooxidans and At. ferrivorans would be psychro tolerant despite the fact that optimugrowth temperature is 20–40 °C, they also cagrow at 8 °C. However, they cannot be considered psychrophilic, as they showed high growth at 28 °C. Temperature is a significant factor in leaching processes, especially in oxidation processes. Lowering the temperature leads to a significant reduction in the rate of oxidation. The rate of chemical oxidation of sulfide minerals with oxygen at environing temperature is very slow. And a significant oxidation might be observed only in the presence of iron-sulfur oxidizing bacteria. Abandoned mines exposed to atmospheric influenceat ambient temperature leads to the formation of acid drainage, which cause environmental pollution. However, the results of this study show that even at a very lotemperature (8 ºC), bacterial growth occurs anbiological catalysis increases the rate of oxidation.

130

Вестник Карагандинского университета

131

These results of the study are important not only from an environmental point of view but also the possible development biological leaching of low-grade oredeposits located in low-temperature areas.

Conclusion

Results of the present study show that the mesophilic microorganisms At. ferrivorans and At. ferro- oxidans are able to grow on ferrouiron at concentrations below 5 g/L and at pH 1.6. As experimental parameters, initial pH 1.6, temperature (8 and 28 ºC), and ferrous iron concentration 4.5 g/L were used, and their effects on ferrous iron oxidation behaviors were studied. In terms of the ferrouiron oxidation behavior according to the reaction temperature, the highest oxidation rate was observed at 2°C, and a lower ferrous iron oxidation efficiency was observed at 8 °C. After 3 days of incubation at 28 ºCAt. ferrooxidans strain 377 was found to be the most effective bacteria compared to other strains for oxidation of ferrous iron; meanwhile, at 8 ºC, At. ferrivorans strain 535 showed the higher efficiency on biooxidation of ferrous iron when compared with At. ferrooxidans.

From the results of the studyit was noted that the selection of bacterial strains to be used for the biooxidation process should depend on temperature of environment. Therremains a need for furtherresearch to verify various reactions engaged inpsychrophilic bioleaching of sulphide minerals and to explain the mechanism which dominates this process.

This work was supported by the Science Committee of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan in the framework of program funding for research (AP05136008).

References

  1. Ngoma E. Bioleaching of arsenopyrite from Janggun mine tailings (South Korea) using an adapted mixed mesophilic culture / E. Ngoma, D. Borja D., M. Smart, K. Shaik, H. Kim, J. Petersen, S.T.L. Harrison // Hydrometallurgy. — 2018. — Vol. 181. — P. 21–28. — URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2018.08.010.
  2. Long Z.E. Biooxidation of ferrous iron by immobilized Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans in poly(vinyl alcohol) cryogel carriers / Z.E. Long, Y. Huang, Z. Cai, W. Cong, FOuyang // Biotechnology Letters. — 2003. — Vol. 25, Iss. 3. — P. 245–249. — URL: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022389510891.
  3. Nemati M. Comparative study on thermophilic and mesophilic biooxidation of ferrous iron / M. Nemati, S.T.L. Harrison // Minerals Engineering. — 2000. — Vol. 13, Iss. 1. — P. 19–24. — URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/S08926875(99)00146–6.
  4. Escobar B. Biooxidation of ferrous iron and sulphide at low temperatures: Implications on acimine drainage and bioleaching of sulphide minerals / B. Escobar, S. Buccicardi, G. Morales, J. Wiertz // Hydrometallurgy. — 2010. — Vol. 104, Iss. 3–4. — P. 454–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2010.03.027.
  5. Meruane G. Bacterial oxidation of ferrous iron by Acidithiobacillus / G. Meruane // Hydrometallurgy. — 2003. — Vol. 71. — P. 149–158. — URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304–386X(03)00151–8.

Серия «Биология. Медицина. География». № 3(99)/2020

  1. Franzmann P.D. Effects of temperature on the rates of iron and sulfur oxidation by selected bioleaching Bacteria and Archaea: Application of the Ratkowsky equation / P.D. Franzmann, C.M. Haddad, R.B. Hawkes, W.J. Robertson, J.J. Plumb // Minerals Engineering. — 2005. — Vol. 18, Iss. 13–14. — P. 1304–1314. — URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2005.04.006.
  2. Nguyen V.K. Bioleaching of arsenic and heavy metals from mine tailings by pure and mixed cultures of Acidithiobacillus spp. / V.K. Nguyen, M.H. Lee, H.J. Park, J.U. Lee // Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry. — 2015. — Vol. 21. — P. 451–458. — URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2014.03.004.
  3. Rawlings D.E. Characteristics and adaptability of iron- and sulfur-oxidizing microorganisms used for the recovery of metals from minerals and their concentrates / D.E. Rawlings // Microbial Cell Factories. — 2005. — No. 4. — P. 1–15. — URL: https://doi.org/10.1186/1475–2859–4-13.
  4. Zhappar N.K. Bacterial and chemical leaching of copper-containing ores with the possibility of subsequent recovery of trace silver / N.K. Zhappar, V.M. Shaikhutdinov, Y.N. Kanafin, O.A. Ten, D.S. Balpanov, I.V. Korolkov, S.R. Collinson, R.S. Erkasov, A.A. Bakibaev // Chemical Papers. — 2019. — Vol. 73, Iss. 6. — P. 1357–1367. — URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11696–019– 00688-y.
  5. Lim K.T. Physical, chemical, and biological methods for the removal of arsenic compounds / K.T. Lim, M.Y. Shukor, H. Wasoh // BioMed Research International. — 2014. — URL: https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/503784.
  6. Tsai S.L. Arsenic metabolism by microbes in nature and the impact on arsenic remediation / S.L. Tsai, S. Singh, W. Chen // Current Opinion in Biotechnology. — 2009. — Vol. 20, Iss. 6. — P. 659–667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2009.09.013.
  7. Novikov V. Foreword Country prooles: Management of waste and chemicals Waste in Central Asia Chemicals in Central Asia Synergies and hotspots Sound management practices / V. Novikov // Success stories. Recommendations. — 2013.
  8. Ko M.S. The role of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans and Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans in arsenic bioleaching from soil / M.S. Ko, H.S. Park, K.W. Kim, J.U. Lee // Environmental Geochemistry and Health. — 2013. — Vol. 35, Iss. 6. — P. 727–733. — URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653–013–9530–2.
  9. Quatrini R. Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans / R. Quatrini, D.B. Johnson // Trends in Microbiology. — 2019. — Vol. 27, Iss. 3. — P. 282–283. — URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2018.11.009.
  10. Rawlings D.E. Thiobacillus caldus and Leptospirillum ferrooxidans are widely distributed in continuous flow biooxidation tanks used to treat a variety of metal containing ores and concentrates / D.E. Rawlings, N.J. Coram, M.N. Gardner, S.M. Deane // Process Metallurgy. — 1999. — Vol. 9. — P. 777–786. — URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1572–4409(99)80080–7.
  11. Elberling B. Bacterial and chemical oxidation of pyritic mine tailings at law temperatures / B. Elberling, A. Schippers, W. Sand // Journal of Contaminant Hydrology. — 2000. —Vol. 41, Iss. 3–4. — P. 225–238. — URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169- 7722(99)00085-6.
  12. Hallberg K.B. Acidithiovbacillus ferrivorans, sp.nov.; facultatively anaerobic, psychrotolerant iron-, and sulfur-oxidizing acidophiles isolated from metal mine-impacted environments / K.B. Hallberg, E. Gonzalez-Toril, D.B. Johnson // Extremophiles. — 2010. — Vol. 14, Iss. 1. — P. 9–19. — URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00792–009-0282-y.
  13. Peng T. Dissolution and passivation of chalcopyrite during bioleaching by acidithiobacillus ferivorans at low temperature / T. Peng, L. Chen, J. Wang, J. Miao, L. Shen, R. Yu, G. Gu. G. Qiu, W. Zeng / Minerals. — 2019. — Vol. 9, Iss. 6. — P. 4–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/min9060332.
Year: 2020
City: Karaganda
Category: Biology